This past week has been dominated by news stories that swing back to ancient times. A sort of back to the future game, the headlines cast by Senator Yerima of Nigeria and the Royal Baby wait contain stories that reprise centuries old tradition and customs. For Senator Yerima, a former Governor of Zamfara state of Nigeria, husband to a teenage wife (he married her at thirteen), his legislative duties brought him opprobrium when he pushed through amendments that effectively lowered the age of marriage to below 18, effectively threatening to legalize medieval practices. For Prince William and the British Monarchy, the birth of a son has further strengthened the royal house of Windsor, effectively securing for the next two generations a bloodline that is over a thousand years old – stretching unbroken to William the Conqueror.

The wait and eventual delivery of the royal son engulfed the whole world in euphoria and unadulterated glee. The event, ultimately a political story, played out like entertainment, eclipsing all that Hollywood can offer. True glitz and star dust, the paparazzi and the proletariat were engaged with the royal circus so much that when the Prince of Cambridge arrived the news was heralded on ticker tape in Times Square and in Sydney and in Jamaica, where he will be King one day, and in scores of countries across the globe.

William the Conqueror, the Duke of Normandy (France) and a descendant of Vikings, was crowned King of England in 1066 in London. Since then all Sovereigns of England have been able to trace their lineage to the French Duke, who, although he was King, did not live in England, but ruled from Normandy and ceded England to his second son at his death as his eldest had to inherit the Duchy of Normandy which was a more prestigious title back then. The British Monarchy thus is the oldest and most prestigious in the world today with the current House of Windsor led by Queen Elizabeth II highly revered and respected. The thousand year monarchy has managed to modernise while maintaining age long traditions and the birth of the royal baby was unique as the baby was destined to be sovereign no matter the gender.

British royal family news is keenly followed by monarchists and anti-monarchists. Be it births, deaths, weddings, divorces or Prince Harry parting naked in a Las Vegas hotel room, the unadulterated, unscripted, real life drama from Buckingham Palace is incomparable to the best reality show ever anywhere. It shows up the best and not-so-best parts of the human being. At the end of the day, the royals are people: people living in a ‘giant fish bowl.’

The yet to be named heir, styled Prince of Cambridge, is third in succession having displaced his uncle Harry. Expected to have a long name (his father is William Arthur Phillip Louis), he is behind his father to the thrones of sixteen independent sovereign states known as the Commonwealth realms: the United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Jamaica, Barbados, The Bahamas, Grenada, Papua New Guinea, the Solomon Islands, Tuvalu, Saint Lucia, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Belize, Antigua and Barbuda, and Saint Kitts and Nevis.

Since his father is still only 30, and Grandpa Charles, the Prince of Wales, has still got to be King, added to the healthy longevity genes of the royals (Queen Victoria, Queen Elizabeth, Prince Phillip and Queen Elizabeth II), he will certainly accede to the throne when most of you reading this blog are dead and gone. But whether we are here or not, and whether the royal baby will be King of a big Commonwealth or just England only as some have predicted, at least the town crier will still be proclaiming, announcing the heralds of William the Conqueror’s descendants.





“Woe to them that go down to Egypt for help.” – Isaiah 31:1

Egypt is a country that has always been looked on with admiration and awe throughout human civilization. The land of the Pharaohs, the Pyramids and the Sphinx, it has been dubbed the ‘cradle of human civilization,’ and its exoticness and prosperity has over the ages drawn the likes of Abraham, the Hebrews, the Greeks and famously the Roman generals Julius Caesar, Mark Anthony and Octavian (Emperor Augustus), who came not only to conquer Egypt but to ‘subdue’ the beautiful Ptolemaic Pharaoh, Cleopatra. Even Mary, the mother of Christ, fled to Egypt with the baby Jesus to escape the wrath of Herod, yet the Bible categorically cautions against going down to Egypt for help.

Watered by the floods of the Nile, Egypt has been an irresistible attraction for people since about 10,000 BC. The indigenous Pharaohs, some of the most popular being Tutankhamun, Horemheb and Rameses II, created ‘wonders of the ancient world,’ alongside building up a strong, proud dynasty, and Egyptian culture, and became literarily ‘Sons of Ra’ (gods).

One of my favourite movies of all time is the 1998 DreamWorks animated feature, Prince of Egypt. Based on the Book of Exodus, it depicts the relationship between Moses and Rameses: brothers and later enemies. But most importantly it showed the technological and infrastructural advancement going on in Egypt as far back as then, some of it actualized on the back of the Hebrew slaves. And in a kind of revolution, the Hebrew slaves become emancipated and leave for home, led by the Prince of Egypt, Moses.

Modern day Egypt has become good at revolutions. Maybe it is as a result of several thousand years of foreign domination: from the Ptolemaic Pharaohs (Greeks), the Romans, Persians, Kurdish, Ottoman and British. For a country whose history dates back to before Abraham, it only became ‘independent’ in 1922. And this independence, reluctantly acquiesced to by the British, came after Egypt arose in revolt against the exiling of Saad Zaghul, the leader of the then populist party Wafd by the British overlords. Or maybe it is the ‘never-say-die’ attitude of the famed ‘Arab Street.’

Fast forward to 1952 and there is another revolution, or coup d’etat if you like. This time led by officers of the armed forces, the most famous being Gamal Nasser, the iconic Egyptian leader. The revolution toppled the British backed King and scraped the constitutional monarchy and aristocratic priviledges. This action inspired the rest of the Arab world and the subsequent conflict with Britain, France and Israel in 1956 helped cement Egypt’s status in Arab affairs.

Having usurped the aristocracy, the Egyptian military since 1952 entrenched themselves as masters of the Nile. That is until Tunisia ruptured in revolution and birthed the Arab Spring. But as the uprisings cooled down across the Middle East, Egypt has continued to sputter and shake, like an old volcano, erupting now and then – inspiring and infuriating – and reminding the world that the land of the Pharaohs, the kingdom of Cleopatra Ptolemy, never ceases to fascinate.

In the Prince of Egypt, Moses and Rameses (played by Val Kilmer and Ralph Fiennes respectively) are a rambunctious pair enjoying the freedom and priviledges of Pharaoh’s sons. Always engaged in practical jokes and games, the boys become a worry for Pharaoh Seti, Rameses’ father, and in one delightful scene, Seti (Patrick Stewart) blurted out in frustration: “Be still! Pharaoh speaks. I seek to build an empire and your only thought is to amuse yourselves by tearing it down! Have I taught you nothing.”

While Morsi’s vanity was certainly not as huge as a Pharaoh’s, Egyptians should hearken to Seti’s (there was a real Pharaoh Seti) words and concentrate on building their nation instead of tearing it down. For those dreaming of copying from the Egyptian “Book of the Revolution,” I refer you instead to the Holy Book: Isaiah 31: 1.